1,800 Words / 7 min. Read
Collapse can be a scary subject, and if you care about climate change and the environment, you’ve probably gotten sucked into some late-night doomscrolling before.1 That’s not our goal with this post.
The main focus of The Reliance School is actionable solutions, so we don’t like to spend too much time on the bad stuff. That said, if you want to change reality, you have to face it first, and we believe that conversation around collapse can help inspire us to take action. That’s our purpose here, and we hope it helps push you in that direction.
If you’re new to collapse theory, this post is a good introduction; it’s written as a conversation (like the Greeks used to do),2 and we tried to keep things as simple as possible without skipping any important stuff. So with that, where should we start?
Fundamentally, collapse is when a complex society reverts back to a simpler state. In practice, that often entails:
a rapid and enduring loss of population, identity and socio-economic complexity. Public services crumble and disorder ensues as government loses control of its monopoly on violence.3
Yes, that's pretty much inevitable. Every civilization in recorded history has collapsed so far,4 so we shouldn’t be any different.
That’s true in some ways, but the things that make it unprecedented actually make it more vulnerable to collapse.
Civilizations collapse for two main reasons: they become too complicated to manage, and they run out of resources.5 In other words, they become victims of their own success.6
Industrial civilization is vastly more complex than the ones that came before it; you’d probably agree with that, right?
To a point, yes. But it takes a ton of energy to do that. We consumed over 175,000 TWh of energy in 2021, compared to 5,000 TWh at the beginning of the 19th century,7 and that’s just to maintain society as it exists right now.
We have a ton of energy available in the form of fossil fuels. But if we continue burning those at current rates, we’ll raise the temperature of the planet to the point where it can no longer support human life.8
Right now, renewable energy is nowhere close to meeting the energy needs of our civilization.9 On top of that, it’s not as energy-dense, it’s harder to store and transport, and supplies are intermittent.10
That’s debatable; some studies predict that we don’t actually have enough mineral resources to decarbonize,11 while others predict that we do.12 And so far, renewable energy has mostly been expanding on fossil fuel production, not displacing it.13
But let’s go all the way to the logical conclusion: what if we had a free, unlimited source of electricity that didn’t require any raw materials at all?
Actually, it would be one of the worst possible outcomes.
Because the more energy we have, the more resources we consume,14 and we’re already consuming more natural resources than the planet can replenish. This is called ecological overshoot; we crossed that line back in 1971,15 and it’s been getting worse ever since.
Overshoot happens all the time in nature; a herd of animals will find a new area with abundant resources, their population grows, the resources are overconsumed, and the herd dies back.16
The basic principle of overshoot is that any given area has a finite amount of resources (known as carrying capacity), and when you consume more than you produce, it’s only a matter of time until you crash.17 The issue with industrial civilization is that the given area is our entire planet, and as they say, there’s no planet B.18
Well, everything,19 but primarily the ones we need to survive and continue this experiment of civilization, like groundwater,20 forests,21 fisheries,22 pollinators,23 general biodiversity,24 topsoil,25 arable land,26 phosphorus,27 sand,28 and economically viable mineral deposits.29
Each of these alone would be enough to destabilize society, and we’re coming up against all of them at once. And the longer we stay in overshoot, the more we degrade our carrying capacity, which amplifies the consequences of collapse. One way or another, our high-energy civilization needs to be scaled down.31
Yes, that’s a good summary.
Exactly.
As a society, or as individuals?
At this point, degrowth seems like the only way out;32 unfortunately it’s going to be very difficult to get society to change course. That’s because most of the problems we’re dealing with are also multipolar traps;33 situations where the best action for an individual creates the worst outcome for a group.
Sure; let’s say there’s a lake full of fish, and some fishermen that depend on those fish to survive. One fisherman invents a net that’s twice as effective as the old ones, so he’s able to catch more fish, sell the surplus at the market, make more nets, and catch even more fish in turn. The other fishermen see his success and decide to make new nets of their own, and before long, everyone’s getting rich at the market.
The problem is, now they’re overfishing the lake; if they continue at this rate, there will be no more fish left. But since everyone’s doing it, the best choice for each individual fisherman is to catch as many fish as possible, so that they can build up their stores before the lake runs out. Do you see the parallel?
Correct, but that only works if you have an authority with the power to enforce the rules (in other words, a monopoly on violence).34 And when we’re talking about global problems, that means we’d need a global authority that could force countries to reduce their consumption (and thereby lower their standards of living). Do you see that happening anytime soon?
Right, and that’s the issue with top-down solutions; the amount of power needed to enact that level of change would be catastrophic if misused, and the people that end up in positions of power aren't usually the ones we want there.35 As Juvenal asks, “Who watches the watchers?”36
That’s the big question that started this whole project. What can we do right now to build resilience and lessen the impact of collapse?
Here’s what we settled on: first, face the reality of the situation (that’s what we’re doing here). Consider the future we may be facing and act accordingly. Second, understand the risks that are unique to your area, and third, prepare for those risks. Make a plan, set aside supplies, and learn the skills necessary to cope with disaster.
Next, become a producer of resources, not just a consumer. If supply chains break down, being able to take care of your basic needs (such as food, water, shelter, heat, power, and transportation) will provide a buffer against scarcity. Lastly, build community. No one person can learn every skill or provide every resource, so fostering close, trusting relationships with those around you will be essential to making it through.
The fall of civilization isn’t a linear event; like a raft floating towards a waterfall, collapse happens slowly, and then very suddenly.37 And by some metrics, America is already there.38 But if we’re going to put a number on it, MIT research predicts that multiple existential crises will converge around 2050.39 And based on deforestation alone, a recent study concluded that we may only have a 10% chance of making it through the next few decades with our civilization intact.40
We have some time, but it takes time to build resilience too. How long does it take to learn a new skill? How long does it take to plant an orchard? How long does it take to save up the money to buy land and build a house? How long does it take to start an intentional community?
Collapse doesn’t happen overnight, but neither does resilience. As the saying goes, "The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now." Or, more relevantly:
“If I knew the world was to end tomorrow, I would still plant an apple tree today.”41
That’s a reasonable question, because there’s always the possibility of a black swan event42 changing the course of history in some unforeseen way. The question we’d ask in response is, what’s the cost of preparing for collapse?
That’s exactly what we’re not proposing. The things we advocate for in our guides - reducing consumption, living simply, growing food, supporting wildlife, and creating community - are all cheap, and they all demonstrably increase your wellbeing. There’s no great sacrifice on the table here, only a deconditioning from consumerism,43 and letting go of the delusion of limitless growth.44
Think of it like Pascal’s Wager;45 if you prepare for collapse and collapse never comes, you can breathe a sigh of relief under the shade of your apple tree. If collapse catches you unprepared, there may be no shelter left to find.
Exactly. The more people that prepare for collapse, the less chaos, hardship, and suffering we’ll be in for as a society. It’s not just about saving yourself; it’s about being able to help those around you make it through as well.
I hope so! I’m going to sign off before this gets too meta, but it’s been really nice talking with you.
We're living in a pivotal time. From the environment to the economy, we're facing a laundry list of crises, and if you've been feeling hopeless or overwhelmed, you're not alone.
We can't predict the future, but we can prepare for it, so we're creating a comprehensive guide to building security and sustainability before it's too late. It's called How to Survive the Future.
Click the button below to explore your content, access free resources, and join today.